This won’t be about statistics. I promise. This has to do with our current cycle of energy that we can relate to the 2016 election. Polls demonstrate a sense of security for the politicians to campaign around. No doubt polls have been a major player in the history of elections… but has anyone asked the true question?
“Who conducts polls on the pollsters?”
Should we submit our own questions for the pollsters to answer?
- What political affiliations surround your company finances?
- How many of your polls are based on bias conditions due to employee interference?
- Were your questionnaires formed as emotionally charged dialogue or were questions pressed concerning personal agendas towards a particular candidate?
- Are Republican & Democratic polling companies only targeting states and persons that conform to their political objectives?
- What are the conditions of your work environment? Are employees registered to any current campaign? Are they politically involved (outside the fact of election polling?)
- Are employees versed in psychological techniques to use during questionnaires?
People have adapted to a media-bias world of information, often coming from the wayside of a political organization or assets that assert personal beliefs upon work delegated to them by the media controlled by that very same political organization.
Is the majority of the United States population influenced by the swaying of poll numbers? Yes; this has proven true throughout the years. In the midst of stats & questionnaires, how large of a role do the subjects of the polling play with the actual election?
The polling companies essentially reach their hand in the cookie jar, receiving crumbs, fallen chips of chocolate… not the whole cookie. The subjects of questionnaires should also be subjected to psychological testing if we are to gain the true insight of validation surrounding their choices. Some polls have achieved this level of testing & legitimacy, but it takes time & money; most companies do not have the resources for this.
Understanding one’s self can only be achieved through the true sense of meditation. These candidates endure countless hours of strategic meetings, press conferences, campaign speeches, and the list goes on. Even though both candidates claim a sect of religion, where does true spirituality come into the equation? Have they already found themselves?
Do they understand the two types of Anamnesis?
Christianity presents it as a statement which refers to the character of the Passion, Resurrection & Ascension of Christ.
On the psychological side, there’s an Anamnesis — a position of finding yourself without being yourself.
Both candidates are realizing the regulation of their soul. A process of individuation as cited in Jungian psychology. They have reached the alchemical process we would label within the ongoing “Magnum Opus”. The self is the greatest power in the psyche, it can cause a person to accompany egomaniac, losing touch with one’s world. This ‘self’ is a creation of mystic images, dream sequences, understanding of the Anamnesis & traits of extra & introversion.
Why do I mention this? Although they’re billions of people on this planet… these two are among the very few to conduct such large waves of energy for this current timeline. There’s a channel for this energy, connected to the ‘self‘ described as above, either to enlarge the ego or to find one’s self through the journey. Neither candidate provides a large angle of emotions to examine; the lapse of this generation seems to be stocking the energy for a future movement.
Energy levels of voters do not achieve the same Quest for the Phoenix. More of that to come.
This is an official PROJECT ASTRAL article.
– Press Graye